|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
immunofluorescence analysis ![]() Immunofluorescence Analysis, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/immunofluorescence analysis/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunofluorescence analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Servicebio Inc
immunofluorescence analysis ![]() Immunofluorescence Analysis, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/immunofluorescence analysis/product/Servicebio Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunofluorescence analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Carl Zeiss
quantitative immunofluorescence analysis ![]() Quantitative Immunofluorescence Analysis, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/quantitative immunofluorescence analysis/product/Carl Zeiss Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
quantitative immunofluorescence analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
TissueGnostics
tissuequest fluorescence analysis software ![]() Tissuequest Fluorescence Analysis Software, supplied by TissueGnostics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/tissuequest fluorescence analysis software/product/TissueGnostics Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tissuequest fluorescence analysis software - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
TissueGnostics
technical support for multiplexed immunofluorescence staining, image scanning and analysis ![]() Technical Support For Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Staining, Image Scanning And Analysis, supplied by TissueGnostics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/technical support for multiplexed immunofluorescence staining, image scanning and analysis/product/TissueGnostics Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
technical support for multiplexed immunofluorescence staining, image scanning and analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Advanced Biosystems Inc
immunofluorescence analysis ![]() Immunofluorescence Analysis, supplied by Advanced Biosystems Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/immunofluorescence analysis/product/Advanced Biosystems Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunofluorescence analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Autolus Inc
immunofluorescence analysis ![]() Immunofluorescence Analysis, supplied by Autolus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/immunofluorescence analysis/product/Autolus Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunofluorescence analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
TissueGnostics
immunofluorescence tissue analysis ![]() Immunofluorescence Tissue Analysis, supplied by TissueGnostics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/immunofluorescence tissue analysis/product/TissueGnostics Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunofluorescence tissue analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
GraphPad Software Inc
immunofluorescence images and analysis ![]() Immunofluorescence Images And Analysis, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/immunofluorescence images and analysis/product/GraphPad Software Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunofluorescence images and analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Becton Dickinson
immunofluorescence and cytofluorimetric analysis ![]() Immunofluorescence And Cytofluorimetric Analysis, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/immunofluorescence and cytofluorimetric analysis/product/Becton Dickinson Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunofluorescence and cytofluorimetric analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
KEYENCE
immunofluorescence analysis ![]() Immunofluorescence Analysis, supplied by KEYENCE, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/immunofluorescence analysis/product/KEYENCE Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunofluorescence analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Beijing Solarbio Science
antiquenching sealer for immunofluorescence analysis ![]() Antiquenching Sealer For Immunofluorescence Analysis, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/antiquenching sealer for immunofluorescence analysis/product/Beijing Solarbio Science Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antiquenching sealer for immunofluorescence analysis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: MedComm
Article Title: Host Translational Control by Stress Granules Promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis
doi: 10.1002/mco2.70479
Figure Lengend Snippet: Mtb infection triggers robust SG formation in macrophages. (A) Immunofluorescence of lung tissues from UN and infected mice. G3bp1 fluorescence intensity was visualized in rainbow color to highlight differences in signal intensity. Scale bar indicates 50 µm. (B, C) Quantification of G3bp1 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) (B) and G3bp1‐positive foci per area (C) from (A). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **** p < 0.0001. N = 12. (D) Immunoblot of SG‐related proteins in lung lysates of UN and Mtb‐infected mice. (E) Immunofluorescence of SG markers in BMDMs infected with Mtb (MOI 1, 12 hpi). Scale bar indicates 10 µm. (F) Immunoblot of SG proteins in BMDMs at indicated times (MOI 1). (G) Quantification of relative band intensities from (F), normalized to β‐Actin. Data are presented as relative band intensities compared to UN. **** p < 0.0001. N = 3. (H) Immunofluorescence G3bp1 in H37Rv‐GFP infected BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi). White arrowhead indicates H37Rv‐GFP‐negative cells. Scale bar indicates 10 µm. (I) Quantification of G3bp1‐positive cell ratio in H37Rv‐GFP − cells or H37Rv‐GFP + cells from (H). **** p < 0.0001. N = 20.
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used for
Techniques: Infection, Immunofluorescence, Fluorescence, Western Blot
Journal: MedComm
Article Title: Host Translational Control by Stress Granules Promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis
doi: 10.1002/mco2.70479
Figure Lengend Snippet: Intracellular ATP level regulates the dynamics of SGs which affect innate immune activity of macrophages. (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of SGs BMDMs treated with 2‐DG or glucose depletion for 24 h. Scale bar indicates 10 µm. (B) Immunofluorescence analysis of SGs in BMDMs infected with Mtb (MOI 1). Scale bar indicates 10 µm. (C) Intracellular ATP concentrations in BMDMs from (A) were plotted with SG‐positive ratio. The ATP concentration (17.5 nmol/mg protein) correlating with 50% of SG‐positive cells is indicated with dotted line and considered as SG‐inducing ATP concentration. (D) Intracellular ATP concentrations of BMDMs from (B) were plotted with SG‐positive ratio. The SG‐inducing ATP concentration (17.5 nmol/mg protein) from (C) is indicated with dotted line. (E) Intracellular ATP concentrations in zymosan, LPS, and PMA‐treated BMDMs. n.s., nonsignificant, * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001. N = 3. (F) Intracellular ATP concentrations in Mtb‐infected BMDMs, following cytochalasin D (Cyto D) treatment. n.s., nonsignificant, **** p < 0.0001. N = 3. (G) Immunoblot analysis of SG markers in BMDMs ± Cyto D after Mtb infection (MOI 1, 24 hpi). (H) Intracellular ATP concentrations in BMDMs treated with empty‐liposome or ATPsome before Mtb infection (MOI 1). n.s., nonsignificant, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. N = 3. (I) Immunoblot analysis of SG markers in BMDMs treated as in (H). (J) Immunofluorescence analysis of SGs in GFP‐Mtb‐infected BMDMs ± ATPsome. Scale bar indicates 10 µm. (K) Quantification of Mtb area per cell in (J). * p < 0.05. N = 15. (L) Intracellular Mtb survival in BMDMs ± ATPsome. Data from three independent experiments are shown as mean ± SEM. **** p < 0.0001. N = 3. (M) BMDM viability (LDH assay) after ATPsome or liposome treatment ± infection (MOI 1) Relative to 0 hpi control (Liposome). n.s., nonsignificant; compared within the same time point. N = 3. (N, O) ROS (N; N = 3) and nitrite (O; N = 3) production was measured in media of BMDMs (MOI 1, 24 hpi) ± ATPsome. * p < 0.05. (P) Experimental scheme for pre‐ or post‐treatment of ATPsome. (Q) Immunoblot analysis of BMDMs pre‐ or post‐treated with ATPsome as in (P) (MOI 1, 24 hpi). (R) Intracellular Mtb survival in BMDMs pre/post‐ATPsome treatments (MOI 1). Data from three independent experiments are shown as mean ± SEM. n.s., nonsignificant, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. N = 9.
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used for
Techniques: Activity Assay, Immunofluorescence, Infection, Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Lactate Dehydrogenase Assay, Control
Journal: MedComm
Article Title: Host Translational Control by Stress Granules Promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis
doi: 10.1002/mco2.70479
Figure Lengend Snippet: SGs suppress host protein synthesis to support Mtb survival. (A) GO analysis of 97 proteins with log 2 ratio (24 hpi/12 hpi) < −1.0 from (Figure ); top five GO categories are shown, ranked by p value. (B) Ribopuromycylation assay of de novo protein synthesis in Mtb‐infected BMDMs (MOI 1). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3. (C) Ribopuromycylation assay in ISRIB‐treated or untreated BMDMs, during Mtb infection (MOI 1). ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. N = 3. (D) Puromycin immunofluorescence in infected BMDMs ± ISRIB (MOI 1, 12 hpi). Puromycin signal intensity was visualized using a rainbow color scale. Scale bar indicates 20 µm. (E) MFI of the puromycin from (D). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01. N = 10. (F) SG‐positive BMDM ratio with or without ISRIB (MOI 1, 12 hpi) were plotted as violin plot with median and quartiles. (G) Intracellular survival of Mtb in ISRIB‐treated or untreated BMDMs (MOI 1). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s., nonsignificant, *** p < 0.001, compared within the same time point. N = 9. (H) Cell viability (LDH assay) of ISRIB‐treated or untreated BMDMs (MOI 1). Relative to 0 hpi ISRIB ‐. n.s., nonsignificant; compared within the same time point. N = 5. (I) Immunofluorescence of SGs in WT (siCont.) and G3bp1/2‐dKD (siG3bp1,2) BMDMs (MOI 1, 24 hpi). Scale bar indicates 20 µm. (J) Quantification of SG‐positive cells from (I). Both Eif3η‐ and Rack1‐positive puncta are considered as SGs. **** p < 0.0001, compared to siCont. N = 15. (K) Immunofluorescence of puromycin in WT and SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi). Rainbow color gradient indicates puromycin signal intensity. Scale bar indicates 20 µm. (L) MFI of puromycin from (K). ** p < 0.01. N = 10. (M) Ribopuromycylation assay in Mtb‐infected SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi). (N) Relative puromycin intensity from (M), normalized to β‐Actin. *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. N = 3. (O) Intracellular survival of Mtb in WT and SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. N = 9. (P) Cell viability (LDH assay) of WT and SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1). Relative to 0 hpi siControl (siCont.). n.s., nonsignificant; compared within the same time point. N = 3.
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used for
Techniques: Infection, Immunofluorescence, Lactate Dehydrogenase Assay
Journal: MedComm
Article Title: Host Translational Control by Stress Granules Promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis
doi: 10.1002/mco2.70479
Figure Lengend Snippet: SGs sequester mTORC1 and inhibit cap‐dependent translation during infection. (A) Heatmap of TORC1 complex protein abundance in Mtb‐infected BMDMs (GO: 0031931; MGI v6.22). (B) Immunoblots of mTORC1 activity over time in infected BMDMs (MOI 1); bar graphs show phospho/total ratios. N = 3. (C) Immunoblots of cap‐dependent translation‐related proteins in infected BMDMs (MOI 1). (D) Heatmap of Spearman correlation coefficients ( ρ ) for pairwise expression patterns of proteins analyzed in (C). (E) Immunofluorescence showing colocalization of mTOR and Raptor with G3bp1 in infected macrophages (MOI 1, 12 hpi). Scale bar indicates 5 µm. (F) Dual‐color pixel analysis quantifying colocalization of mTORC1 components with G3bp1 from (E). Pearson correlation coefficients ( r ) are shown. (G) Co‐immunoprecipitation of G3bp1 with mTOR and Raptor from infected BMDMs (MOI 1, 24 hpi). (H) PLA showing spatial interaction of mTOR or Raptor with G3bp1 in infected BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi). Scale bar indicates 5 µm. (I) Immunofluorescence of Astrin colocalizing with G3bp1 and Raptor in infected BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi). Scale bar indicates 4 µm. (J) Immunoblot of Astrin expression in infected BMDMs (MOI 1). (K) PLA showing Astrin interactions with G3bp1 and Raptor in infected BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi). Scale bar indicates 5 µm. (L) Immunoblots of SG markers, mTORC1, cap‐dependent translation proteins, and puromycin incorporation in SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi).
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used for
Techniques: Infection, Quantitative Proteomics, Western Blot, Activity Assay, Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Immunoprecipitation
Journal: MedComm
Article Title: Host Translational Control by Stress Granules Promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis
doi: 10.1002/mco2.70479
Figure Lengend Snippet: SGs impair mitochondrial complex I activity during Mtb infection. (A) Scheme illustrating the breakdown of oxygen consumption following the addition of the specified inhibitors for assessing oxygen consumption rates (OCRs). (B) OCRs in WT and SG neg macrophages infected with Mtb (MOI 1). Cells were transfected with either siControl (left) or siG3bp1/2 (right) for 48 h before infection. (C–E) Quantification of relative basal (C), maximal (D), and ATP‐linked respirations (E) from (B). Normalized to each UN control (pink‐colored dotted line). Pink p value versus UN, black p value versus siCont. n.s., nonsignificant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. N = 3. (F) Mitochondrial membrane potential (JC‐1 red/green ratio) in infected WT and SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1; normalized to UN; pink dotted line). n.s., nonsignificant, **** p < 0.0001. N = 3. (G) Intracellular ATP concentrations in infected WT and SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1). **** p < 0.0001. N = 3. (H) Lactate secretion from UN or Mtb‐infected WT and SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1). n.s., nonsignificant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. N = 3. (I) STRING analysis (v11.5) of 37 proteins upregulated in SG neg BMDMs and simultaneously present in the SG proteome, grouped into translation (Cluster 1), mitochondria (Cluster 2), and nuclear import complex (Cluster 3). (J) Immunoblot of whole‐cell lysate (WCL), cytosolic fraction, and mitochondria fraction from Mtb‐infected WT and SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi). (K) Immunofluorescence analysis of G3bp1‐Ndufa12 colocalization in Mtb‐infected WT and SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi); line profiles show fluorescence intensity (white arrow). Scale bar indicates 5 µm. (L) Mitochondrial complex I activity in Mtb‐infected WT and SG neg BMDMs (MOI 1, 12 hpi); rotenone as positive control. Relative mitochondrial complex I activity is plotted, compared to uninfected siControl cells. n.s., nonsignificant, **** p < 0.0001. N = 3.
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used for
Techniques: Activity Assay, Infection, Transfection, Control, Membrane, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Fluorescence, Positive Control
Journal: MedComm
Article Title: Host Translational Control by Stress Granules Promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis
doi: 10.1002/mco2.70479
Figure Lengend Snippet: Inhibition of SGs restores macrophage immune function and restricts Mtb in vivo. (A) Experimental scheme for the in vivo experiments. Mice were transfected with siRNAs via intravenous (i.v.) injection, followed by intratracheal infection with Mtb for 7 days. Seven days postinfection, siRNA transfection was repeated, and the mice were sacrificed another 7 days later for experiments. (B) Immunofluorescence analysis of lung tissues from siRNA‐transfected uninfected (UN) or Mtb‐infected mice. G3bp1 fluorescence intensity was visualized in rainbow color. Scale bar indicates 20 µm. (C) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of G3bp1 signals from (B). * p < 0.05. N = 10. (D) Immunoblot analysis of SG markers, mTORC1, and cap‐dependent translation proteins in lung lysates. (E) Quantification of relative band intensities from (D). Data are presented as relative band intensities compared to uninfected siControl group (UN/siCont.). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3. (F) H&E staining of lung tissues from siRNA‐transfected uninfected (UN) or Mtb‐infected mice. Scale bar indicates 200 µm. (G) Quantification of TNF and MCP‐1 levels in mouse serum. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. N = 5. (H) Lung CFU in Mtb‐infected mouse lung tissues. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **** p < 0.0001. N = 7. (I) Immunofluorescence analysis of lung tissues from ISRIB‐treated and Mtb‐infected mice. G3bp1 fluorescence intensity was visualized in rainbow color. Scale bar indicates 10 µm. (J) MFI of G3bp1 from (H). **** p < 0.0001. N = 10. (K) Lung CFU in ISRIB‐treated and Mtb‐infected mouse lung tissues. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05. N = 9.
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used for
Techniques: Inhibition, In Vivo, Transfection, Injection, Infection, Immunofluorescence, Fluorescence, Western Blot, Staining
Journal: Experimental cell research
Article Title: Characterization of stitch adhesions: fibronectin-containing cell-cell contacts formed by fibroblasts
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111616
Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunofluorescence of CHX-treated fibroblasts incubated with full length FN or fragments of FN and stained for fibronectin (green) and actin (red). (A) The control CHX-treated cells did not stain with anti-fibronectin antibodies, indicating that synthesis and secretion of FN were completely blocked. (B) Prominent fibronectin stitches were observed between adjacent cells after incubation with full-length plasma FN. No organized FN was detected in samples incubated for the same period of time with 70kD (C) or 120kD (D) fibronectin fragments. Nuclei (blue) were stained with Hoechst. Insets present only fibronectin staining. Arrowheads in B indicate free cellular edges devoid of FN. Bar = 50μm.
Article Snippet: Statistics The average and standard deviation (SD) of
Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Incubation, Staining, Control, Clinical Proteomics
Journal: Experimental cell research
Article Title: Characterization of stitch adhesions: fibronectin-containing cell-cell contacts formed by fibroblasts
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111616
Figure Lengend Snippet: Dynamics of FN stitch development. (A) Pulse-chase analysis of the formation of stitch adhesions using labeled fibronectin preparations. CHX-treated fibroblasts were incubated with fibronectin labeled with green Alexa 488 (FN-488) for 1 hour, followed by another hour of incubation with fibronectin labeled with red Alexa 594 (FN-488/FN-594). Arrows indicate stitches formed during the second hour of incubation. Merged fluorescence and phase contrast images show localization of labeled stitches at places of cell-cell contacts. Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst (blue). Bar = 20μm. (B) Determination of stitch length. CHX-treated fibroblast were incubated with fibronectin for different periods, fixed and stained with anti-fibronectin antibodies. The lengths of FN stitches were measured on immunofluorescence images and presented as box plots.
Article Snippet: Statistics The average and standard deviation (SD) of
Techniques: Pulse Chase, Labeling, Incubation, Fluorescence, Staining, Immunofluorescence
Journal: Experimental cell research
Article Title: Characterization of stitch adhesions: fibronectin-containing cell-cell contacts formed by fibroblasts
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111616
Figure Lengend Snippet: Adhesion stitches aligned with actin filament bundles and associated with proteins typical of the integrin adhesome. Immunofluorescence images of (A) CHX-treated fibroblasts incubated with 25 μg/ml human plasma FN for 4 hours and then stained with anti-fibronectin antibodies (FN) and rhodamine-phalloidin (actin). Merged images (overlay) demonstrated alignment between actin bundles and fibronectin stitches (arrows). Fibronectin fibrils occasionally bridged the gap between neighboring cells (arrowheads). Bar = 20μm. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments of (B) CHX-treated cells in the absence (−FN) or presence (+FN) of fibronectin performed with anti-β1 integrin antibody 9EG7 (IP:9EG7) and rat IgG2a,κ isotype antibody control (IP:IgG), followed by Western blotting (WB) with antibodies against the indicated proteins revealed strong enrichment of adhesome proteins in β1 integrin complexes after incubation of cells with FN. Loading controls prior to immunoprecipitation (Lysate) are also shown.
Article Snippet: Statistics The average and standard deviation (SD) of
Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Incubation, Clinical Proteomics, Staining, Immunoprecipitation, Control, Western Blot
Journal: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Article Title: Polygalacic acid attenuates cognitive impairment by regulating inflammation through PPARγ / NF‐κB signaling pathway
doi: 10.1111/cns.14581
Figure Lengend Snippet: Inhibitory effects of PA on inflammation induced by Aβ42 oligomer in mice. (A) TNF‐α, (B) IL‐1β, and (C) IL‐6 were examined using ELISA ( n = 6 per group). (D) Immunofluorescence analysis of Iba‐1, bar = 25 μm. (E) Western blots and (F) quantitative analysis of Iba‐1 ( n = 3 per group). All values are presented as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with the control group. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, and #### p < 0.001 compared with the AD model group.
Article Snippet: Blocking goat serum, Triton X‐100, DAPI nuclear staining, and antiquenching sealer for
Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Immunofluorescence, Western Blot, Control
Journal: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Article Title: Polygalacic acid attenuates cognitive impairment by regulating inflammation through PPARγ / NF‐κB signaling pathway
doi: 10.1111/cns.14581
Figure Lengend Snippet: NF‐κB expressions in the nucleus and cytoplasm after adding the inhibitor of PPARγ. (A) Western blots analysis for NF‐κB p65 subunit in nuclear and cytosolic and quantitative analysis of corresponding proteins. (B) The representative immunofluorescence images showing translocation of NF‐κB (p65, red) to the nucleus (blue) after treatment with Aβ42 oligomers or pretreat with PA or adding the inhibitor of GW9662. Bar = 50 μm. (C) Percent of nuclear NF‐κB p65‐positive cells. Values were expressed as the mean of at least three independent replicates, whose means resulted from 50 cells from three independent fields of view. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 compared with control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, and #### p < 0.001 compared with the Aβ42 stimulated group; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01, &&& p < 0.001, and &&&& p < 0.001 compared with the PA treatment group. n = 3 for Western analysis, one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post‐hoc test. Bars represent mean ± SD.
Article Snippet: Blocking goat serum, Triton X‐100, DAPI nuclear staining, and antiquenching sealer for
Techniques: Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Translocation Assay, Control